mirror of
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips.git
synced 2024-12-13 19:06:24 +00:00
deleting-replaceables
This commit is contained in:
parent
85df9b0e89
commit
0535f01508
15
09.md
15
09.md
@ -14,14 +14,13 @@ The event's `content` field MAY contain a text note describing the reason for th
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
```jsonc
|
||||
{
|
||||
"kind": 5,
|
||||
"pubkey": <32-bytes hex-encoded public key of the event creator>,
|
||||
"tags": [
|
||||
["e", "dcd59..464a2"],
|
||||
["e", "968c5..ad7a4"],
|
||||
["a", "<kind>:<pubkey>:<d-identifier>"]
|
||||
],
|
||||
"content": "these posts were published by accident",
|
||||
...other fields
|
||||
@ -34,9 +33,9 @@ Relays SHOULD continue to publish/share the deletion events indefinitely, as cli
|
||||
|
||||
## Client Usage
|
||||
|
||||
Clients MAY choose to fully hide any events that are referenced by valid deletion events. This includes text notes, direct messages, or other yet-to-be defined event kinds. Alternatively, they MAY show the event along with an icon or other indication that the author has "disowned" the event. The `content` field MAY also be used to replace the deleted events' own content, although a user interface should clearly indicate that this is a deletion reason, not the original content.
|
||||
Clients MAY choose to fully hide any events that are referenced by valid deletion events. This includes text notes, direct messages, or other yet-to-be defined event kinds. Alternatively, they MAY show the event along with an icon or other indication that the author has "disowned" the event. The `content` field MAY also be used to replace the deleted events' own content, although a user interface should clearly indicate that this is a deletion reason, not the original content.
|
||||
|
||||
A client MUST validate that each event `pubkey` referenced in the `e` tag of the deletion request is identical to the deletion request `pubkey`, before hiding or deleting any event. Relays can not, in general, perform this validation and should not be treated as authoritative.
|
||||
A client MUST validate that each event `pubkey` referenced in the `e` tag of the deletion request is identical to the deletion request `pubkey`, before hiding or deleting any event. Relays can not, in general, perform this validation and should not be treated as authoritative.
|
||||
|
||||
Clients display the deletion event itself in any way they choose, e.g., not at all, or with a prominent notice.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -46,4 +45,10 @@ Relays MAY validate that a deletion event only references events that have the s
|
||||
|
||||
## Deleting a Deletion
|
||||
|
||||
Publishing a deletion event against a deletion has no effect. Clients and relays are not obliged to support "undelete" functionality.
|
||||
Publishing a deletion event against a deletion has no effect. Clients and relays are not obliged to support "undelete" functionality.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deleting Replaceable Events
|
||||
|
||||
Because of their changing nature it's hard to get rid of all instance of a replaceable event (ranges `10000...19999` and `30000...39999`). We also don't want to publish a `kind:5` targeting an `a` reference and thus permanently delete any future events that could possibly have the same specifieds `kind` and `d`-tag forever.
|
||||
|
||||
So instead to delete a replaceable event we **overwrite** it with an event with the same `kind` and `d`-tag, plus a tag `["deleted"]` specifying no other tags.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user