Accept suggestion

Co-authored-by: Roland <33993199+rolznz@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jeremy Klein 2025-02-14 00:00:24 -08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 89b77dde57
commit e1fe193cfb
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

2
47.md
View File

@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ If the **wallet service** does not support the specified encryption scheme, it w
As described above in the [Notifications](#notifications) section, if a **wallet service** supports both nip04 and nip44, it should publish two notification events for each notification - kind 23196 encrypted with NIP-04, and kind 23197 encrypted with NIP-44. If the **wallet service** only supports nip44, it should only publish kind 23197 events.
The **client** should check the `encryption` tag in the `info` event to determine which encryption schemes the **wallet service** supports, and listen to the appropriate notification event. Clients that support both nip04 and nip44 can choose to only listen to 23197 events for simplicity.
The **client** should check the `encryption` tag in the `info` event to determine which encryption schemes the **wallet service** supports, and listen to the appropriate notification event.
## Using a dedicated relay
This NIP does not specify any requirements on the type of relays used. However, if the user is using a custodial service it might make sense to use a relay that is hosted by the custodial service. The relay may then enforce authentication to prevent metadata leaks. Not depending on a 3rd party relay would also improve reliability in this case.